How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing

Psychological Review 107 (2):358-367 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Richard Joyce's new objections to the divine command theory.Scott Hill - 2010 - Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (1):189-196.
“The Ethics of Genetic Testing”.G. T. Roche - 2013 - In Roy G. Beran (ed.), Legal and Forensic Medicine. Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 1519- 1533..
Why do funding agencies favor hypothesis testing?Chris Haufe - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):363-374.
Editor's Comment.Jim Garrison - 1947 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 5 (3):283-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
39 (#408,230)

6 months
11 (#237,138)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
The methodology of scientific research programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1978 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions.Philip Kitcher - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (3):929-932.

View all 18 references / Add more references