Comment: Where is the Theory? A Critical Comment on Multiple Arousal Theory

Emotion Review 8 (1):82-83 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Multiple arousal theory suggests that there is more than one arousal system and that the activity of the multiple arousal systems can be observed using electrodermal measures at various body sites. The ideas expressed by multiple arousal theory are interesting but they do not constitute a theory. The absence of a specific definition of arousal and the lack of testable predictions prevent multiple arousal theory from constituting a useful theoretical framework for focussed empirical research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Soros' Theory of Reflexivity: a critical comment.Tony Lawson - 2013 - Revue de Philosophie Économique 14 (1):29-48.
Comment discipliner les finances publiques.L. Boone & J. Pisani-Ferry - 2011 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 17.
A comment on developed theory and theory development.David Willer - 1992 - Sociological Theory 10 (1):106-110.
Toward a general sociological theory of emotions.Jonathan H. Turner - 1999 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 (2):133–161.
On Negative Spirit in Adorno's Musical Sociology.Ting Yang & Ren-Ming Zhang - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):79-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-20

Downloads
21 (#743,384)

6 months
3 (#984,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?