'Erro de Descartes' ou Erro de um Título?

Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (7):163-170 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article we summarize the central thesis of A. Damásio in his book Descartes' Error. We appreciate the scientifical interest of this work but we criticize the way some philosophical questions are stated, namely the concept of reason and Descartes’ contribution to the mind - body problem. When Damásio accuses Descartes of being guilty for sustaining a «disimbodied mind», he forgets the works where this philosopher explores the mind-body interaction and his broad concept of thinking as including feeling and will. Therefore, we question the title of this work and the false expectations it can produce on his readers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Que Verdade no Erro de Descartes?Pedro M. S. Alves - 1996 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (7):171-178.
Augustine.Paul G. Kuntz - 1980 - Augustinian Studies 11:79-89.
Augustine.Paul G. Kuntz - 1980 - Augustinian Studies 11:79-89.
Teoria do Erro: uma avaliação crítica.Jamie Parera Rebello - 2017 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 62 (2):453-466.
Descartes, Princípios da Filosofia. [REVIEW]Maria Luísa Ribeiro Ferreira - 1996 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (8):166-169.
Imaginação E erro em Pascal E espinosa.Gabriel Frizzarin - 2020 - Cadernos Espinosanos 43:429-461.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-05

Downloads
3 (#1,716,465)

6 months
1 (#1,478,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references