- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The learnability of voting rules
Artificial Intelligence 173 (12-13):1133-1149 (2009)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
A characterization of majority voting rules with quorums.Nicolas Houy - 2009 - Theory and Decision 67 (3):295-301.
On the stability of a triplet of scoring rules.Mostapha Diss & Vincent Merlin - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (2):289-316.
Voting rules as error-correcting codes.Ariel D. Procaccia, Nisarg Shah & Yair Zick - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence 231 (C):1-16.
Some Remarks on Dodgson's Voting Rule.Felix Brandt - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (4):460-463.
Strategic Voting Under Uncertainty About the Voting Method.Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit - 2019 - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 297:252–272.
Computational complexity in the design of voting rules.Koji Takamiya & Akira Tanaka - 2016 - Theory and Decision 80 (1):33-41.
Decision-theoretic paradoxes as voting paradoxes.Rachael Briggs - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (1):1-30.
Learnability, hyperlearning, and the poverty of the stimulus.Geoffrey K. Pullum - 1996 - In J. Johnson, M. L. Juge & J. L. Moxley (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting: General Session and Parasession on the Role of Learnability in Grammatical Theory. Berkeley: California: Berkeley Linguistics Society. pp. 498-513.
Judgment aggregation by quota rules: Majority voting generalized.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2007 - Journal of Theoretical Politics 19 (4):391-424.
A Utilitarian Assessment of Alternative Decision Rules in the Council of Ministers.Claus Beisbart, Luc Bovens & Stephan Hartmann - 2005 - European Union Politics 6 (4):395-419.
Postulates and Paradoxes of Relative Voting Power - A Critical Re-Appraisal.Dan S. Felsenthal - 1995 - Theory and Decision 38 (2):195-229.
Learnability of Pregroup Grammars.Denis Béchet, Annie Foret & Isabelle Tellier - 2007 - Studia Logica 87 (2-3):225-252.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
6 (#1,464,203)
6 months
5 (#645,438)
2020-12-22
Downloads
6 (#1,464,203)
6 months
5 (#645,438)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Optimal social choice functions: A utilitarian view.Craig Boutilier, Ioannis Caragiannis, Simi Haber, Tyler Lu, Ariel D. Procaccia & Or Sheffet - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence 227 (C):190-213.
Optimizing positional scoring rules for rank aggregation.Ioannis Caragiannis, Xenophon Chatzigeorgiou, George A. Krimpas & Alexandros A. Voudouris - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 267 (C):58-77.
On the approximability of Dodgson and Young elections.Ioannis Caragiannis, Jason A. Covey, Michal Feldman, Christopher M. Homan, Christos Kaklamanis, Nikos Karanikolas, Ariel D. Procaccia & Jeffrey S. Rosenschein - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence 187-188 (C):31-51.
Algorithms for strategyproof classification.Reshef Meir, Ariel D. Procaccia & Jeffrey S. Rosenschein - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence 186 (C):123-156.
Robust winner determination in positional scoring rules with uncertain weights.Paolo Viappiani - 2020 - Theory and Decision 88 (3):323-367.
References found in this work
Anyone but him: The complexity of precluding an alternative.Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra & Jörg Rothe - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (5-6):255-285.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rv6xt uwo