The logic of projectibility

Philosophy of Science 39 (3):302-314 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Projectible conditions are (roughly) those whose universal generalizations are con firmed by their positive instances. This paper proposes certain modifications to the above definition in order to capture the pre-analytic notion it is supposed to explicate. Then we investigate what logical operations, when performed on projectible conditionals, yield new projectible conditionals. A number of surprising theorems are proven, and these theorems indicate that few conditionals having complex antecedents and consequents are projectible. It is also shown that projectibility is not closed under contraposition, and this is proposed as a solution to the Paradox of the Ravens. Finally, a general conjecture is made concerning just what conditionals are projectible, and it follows from this conjecture that although most conditionals are not projectible, they can still be dealt with inductively, but in ways more complex than recognized by classical confirmation theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Subjunctive biscuit and stand-off conditionals.Eric Swanson - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):637-648.
Earman on the Projectibility of Grue.Marc Lange - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:87 - 95.
Luck and decision.Will Barrett - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):73–87.
On projecting grue.John Moreland - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (3):363-377.
A relevant theory of conditionals.Edwin D. Mares & André Fuhrmann - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (6):645 - 665.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#326,216)

6 months
14 (#183,612)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Pollock
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Subjunctive generalizations.John L. Pollock - 1974 - Synthese 28 (2):199 - 214.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A purely syntactical definition of confirmation.Carl G. Hempel - 1943 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):122-143.
Emeroses by other names.Donald Davidson - 1966 - Journal of Philosophy 63 (24):778-780.
Hempel, Scheffler, and the ravens.Lawrence Foster - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (4):107-114.

Add more references