O Arcaísmo da Substancialidade No Escrito da Diferença de Hegel

Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 64 (156):729-747 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that one of the reasons for Hegel’s failure in consummating the project of “construct the absolute for consciousness” presented in 1801 in his Writing on Difference consisted in the patent mismatch between the negativity to which the determinations of finitude would be submitted and the conception of the absolute still substantially thought. Precisely, what we call here the archaism of substantiality would set the tone of this mismatch that still entailed the heterogeneity between finitude, with its way of ascending to the absolute, and the absolute itself. Among other things, this will become clearer observing the formalism of the intuitionist proposal that Hegel presents at that time, aiming to safeguard the elevation of consciousness without its intrinsic negativity tainting the absolutity of the principle to which it was elevated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

O platonismo de Hegel: O absoluto.Osvaldino Marra Rodrigues - 2018 - Claridades. Revista de Filosofía 2 (1):133-140.
O platonismo de Hegel: O absoluto.Osvaldino Marra Rodrigues - 2010 - Claridades. Revista de Filosofía 2 (1):133-140.
Deus e o Absoluto.Denis Lerrer Rosenfield - 2018 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 63 (1):33-51.
Gênese Do "espírito Ético" Na Filosofia Do Espírito De Jena.Erick de Lima - 2007 - Cadernos de Ética E Filosofia Política 10:79-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-13

Downloads
4 (#1,625,167)

6 months
4 (#792,283)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Briefe von und an Hegel.J. Hoffmeister - 1972 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 162:359-362.
Fonti spinoziane della dialettica di Hegel.Leo Lugarini - 1982 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 36 (139/140):21.
Substanz und subjekt.Walter Jaeschke - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (3):439-458.

Add more references