In Stephen Hetherington (ed.),
Aspects of Knowing. Elsevier Science. pp. 17 (
2006)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
A person’s being justified in a belief will sometimes depend on her being justified in some other belief. I argue that this concept of epistemic dependence is required for setting up the debate between epistemological foundationalism and its alternatives. I also argue that the concept is deeply problematic, in that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to give a coherent account of it. Several possible analyses of epistemic dependence are presented and found wanting, and attention is given to different types of justifiedness. I conclude that the debate between foundationalists, coherentists and others is in need of a new conceptual framework.