De Volder’s Cartesian Physics and Experimental Pedagogy

In Mihnea Dobre Tammy Nyden (ed.), Cartesian Empiricisms. Springer (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1675, Burchard de Volder (1643–1709) was the first professor to introduce the demonstration of experiment into a university physics course and built the Leiden Physics Theatre to accommodate this new pedagogy. When he requested the funds from the university to build the facility, he claimed that the performance of experiments would demonstrate the “truth and certainty” of the postulates of theoretical physics. Such a claim is interesting given de Volder’s lifelong commitment to Cartesian scientia. This chapter will examine de Volder’s views on experiment and show that they are not Newtonian or inductivist, as is sometimes claimed. While de Volder thinks we need deductive reasoning from first principles to provide evidence of the certainty of the content of our physical theories, he also contends that we need experiment to provide evidence of the certainty of the existence of the particular bodies those theories discuss. This approach to experiment is based on a distinction between rational certainty and the certainty of material bodies in the actual world. While this account is deeply influenced by Descartes, it is importantly different than Descartes’ distinction between absolute and moral certainty. De Volder’s “Cartesian Empiricism” is best understood as a continuation and further development of a long tradition of teaching through observation at Leiden.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The debate over extended substance in Leibniz's correspondence with de Volder.Paul Lodge - 2001 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (2):155 – 165.
Klein on Relative Certainty.Rod Bertolet - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:271-274.
Cartesian Certainty and the Infinity of the Will.Joseph K. Cosgrove - 2004 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (4):377 - 396.
Cartesian Empiricisms.Mihnea Dobre & Tammy Nyden (eds.) - 2013 - Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
Pathways to certainty.William Adams Brown - 1930 - London,: C. Scribner's sons.
Wittgenstein and basic moral certainty.Nigel Pleasants - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (4):669-679.
Science, Certainty, and Descartes.Gary Hatfield - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:249 - 262.
The Certainty of Sense-Certainty.Nathan Andersen - 2010 - Idealistic Studies 40 (3):215-234.
Cartesian Uncertainty.M. Glouberman - 1986 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 27 (1):101-124.
Wittgenstein's scepticism' in on certainty.Norman Malcolm - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):277 – 293.
Why Certainty is Not a Mansion.Elly Vintiadis - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:143-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-02

Downloads
46 (#346,431)

6 months
39 (#97,883)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tammy Nyden
Grinnell College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Material beings.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Meditations on First Philosophy.René Descartes - 1984 [1641] - Ann Arbor: Caravan Books. Edited by Stanley Tweyman.
Kant and the exact sciences.Michael Friedman - 1992 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 244 references / Add more references