- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Rational engagement, emotional response and the prospects for progress in animal use ‘debates’
Abstract
This paper is designed to help people rationally engage moral issues regarding the treatment of animals, specifically uses of animals in medical and psychological experimentation, basic research, drug development, education and training, consumer product testing and other areas.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Emotional engagement in professional ethics.W. Scott Dunbar - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):535-551.
So why does animal experimentation matter? Review of Ellen Frankel Paul and Jeffrey Paul, eds. 2001. Why animal experimentation matters: The use of animals in medical research.Nathan Nobis - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):1 – 2.
On justifying the exploitation of animals in research.S. F. Sapontzis - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):177-196.
Mixed Feelings: Conflicts in Emotional Responses to Film.James Harold - 2010 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 34 (1):280-294.
The Invisibility of Evil: Moral Progress and the 'Animal Holocaust'.Timothy M. Costelloe - 2003 - Philosophical Papers 32 (2):109-131.
A Rational Defense of Animal Experimentation.Nathan Nobis - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):49-62.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
312 (#65,417)
6 months
8 (#365,731)
2009-01-28
Downloads
312 (#65,417)
6 months
8 (#365,731)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Interests and Harms in Primate Research.Nathan Nobis - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):27-29.
Primate Stroke Research: Still Not Interested.Monica L. Gerrek - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):29-30.
References found in this work
Ethics and the Beast: A Speciesist Argument for Animal Liberation.Tzachi Zamir - 2007 - Princeton University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-pqwqt uwo