The 'Reviewers Reviewed': Science in the Nineteenth-Century Periodical [Book Review]

Metascience 14 (3):363-370 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2006

DOI

10.1007/s11016-005-3432-6

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Periodicals and Controversy.Bernard Lightman - 2011 - Spontaneous Generations 5 (1):5-11.
Theology as Science in Nineteenth-Century Germany: From F.C. Baur to Ernst Troeltsch.Johannes Zachhuber - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
Atom and aether in nineteenth-century physical science.Alan F. Chalmers - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (3):157-166.
What did “theory” mean to nineteenth-century chemists?Alan Rocke - 2013 - Foundations of Chemistry 15 (2):145-156.
Routledge History of Philosophy Volume Vii: The Nineteenth Century.C. L. Ten (ed.) - 1994 - Routledge.
Thanks to Our Reviewers in 2013! A scientific journal’s greatest responsibility is to ensure that all contributions accepted for publication are rigorously but fairly reviewed. We gratefully acknowledge the valued support of all scientists who have reviewed papers for this journal in 2013. [REVIEW] Admin - 2014 - Disputatio.
Nineteenth century studies: Coleridge to Matthew Arnold.Basil Willey - 1961 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nineteenth century studies.Basil Willey - 1949 - New York,: Columbia University Press.
Introduction : Levinas, twenty-first century ethical criticism, and their nineteenth-century contexts.Donald R. Wehrs & David P. Haney - 2009 - In Donald R. Wehrs & David P. Haney (eds.), Levinas and Nineteenth-Century Literature: Ethics and Otherness From Romanticism Through Realism. University of Delaware Press.
On clarifying the role of originality and fair use in 19th century uk jurisprudence: Appreciating 'the Humble Grey which emerges as the result of long controversy'.Kathy Bowrey - unknown
What We Owe the Author: rethinking editorial peer review.N. J. Crigger - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (5):451-457.
Theories of scientific method: the Renaissance through the nineteenth century.Ralph M. Blake - 1960 - New York: Gordon & Breach. Edited by Curt John Ducasse & Edward H. Madden.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
10 (#1,217,423)

6 months
7 (#486,539)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references