Thanks to Our Reviewers in 2013! A scientific journal’s greatest responsibility is to ensure that all contributions accepted for publication are rigorously but fairly reviewed. We gratefully acknowledge the valued support of all scientists who have reviewed papers for this journal in 2013 [Book Review]

Disputatio (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Editorial: Rights and Procreative Liberty.Doris Schroeder - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):325-325.
Reviewer acknowledgement 2013.Fernando Marques - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):6.
Reviewed on page 148 of volume 43 of the journal, or to the review itself (which contains full bibliographical information for the reviewed publication). Analogously, a reference" bsl VII 376" refers to the review beginning on page 376 in volume 7 of this bulletin, or to the publication there reviewed." Jsl lv 347" refers to one of the reviews or one of the publications reviewed or listed on page 347 of volume 55 of the journal, with reliance on. [REVIEW]Denis Hirschfeldt, Hannes Leitgeb, Roger Maddux, Grigori Mints & Volker Peckhaus - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (3).
Submission Reviewers for Volume 9, 2013.D. P. Dash - 2013 - Journal of Research Practice 9 (2).
An economic model of scientific rules.José Luis Ferreira & Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (2):191-212.
Mathematics Sent Across the Channel and the Atlantic: British Mathematical Contributions to European and American Scientific Journals, 1835–1900.Sloan Evans Despeaux - 2008 - Annals of Science 65 (1):73-99.
Addiction and Responsibility. [REVIEW]Joanna Korman - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology 27 (6):930-934.
Speak No Evil: Scientists, Responsibility, and the Public Understanding of Science. [REVIEW]Nicholas G. Evans - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (3):215-220.
Peer review and publication: Lessons for lawyers.Susan Haack - 2007 - Stetson Law Review 36 (3).
Copies of books to asl, box 742, vassar college, 124 Raymond avenue, poughkeepsie, ny 12604, usa. In a review, a reference “jsl xliii 148,” for example, refers either to the publication reviewed on page 148 of volume 43 of the journal, or to the review itself (which contains full bibliographical information for the reviewed publication). Analogously, a reference. [REVIEW]Anuj Dawar Colyvan, Steffen Lempp, Rahim Moosa, Ernest Schimmerling & Alex Simpson - 2013 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 19 (2).
Using a dialectical scientific brief in Peer review.Arthur Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-13

Downloads
7 (#1,387,520)

6 months
1 (#1,471,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references