Technology Changes the Ethical Stakes in HIV Surveillance and Prevention: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Reassessing the Ethics of Molecular HIV Surveillance in the Era of Cluster Detection and Response”

&
American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):W1-W3 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Volume 20, Issue 10, October 2020, Page W1-W3.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2020.1815472

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response.Kevin Macnish - 2014 - Surveillance and Society 12 (1):175-181.
Just Surveillance? Towards a Normative Theory of Surveillance.Kevin Macnish - 2014 - Surveillance and Society 12 (1):142-153.
Surveillance and persuasion.Michael Nagenborg - 2014 - Ethics and Information Technology 16 (1):43-49.
Mapping the Terrain of a Foucauldian Ethics: A Response to the Surveillance of Schooling.Frank Pignatelli - 2002 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (2):157-180.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Neuroimaging Techniques for Memory Detection: Scientific, Ethical and Legal Issues".Daniel V. Meegan - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):1-4.
Who Watches the Watchers? Towards an Ethic of Surveillance in a Digital Age.Eric Stoddart - 2008 - Studies in Christian Ethics 21 (3):362-381.
An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality and Surveillance.Kevin Macnish - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):529-548.
Being Watched: The Ethics of Targeted Surveillance.Kevin Macnish - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 63:84-90.
Covert video surveillance: the Staffordshire Protocol--a response to Dr Shinebourne.T. Thomas - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):349-351.
Bentham, Deleuze and Beyond: An Overview of Surveillance Theories from the Panopticon to Participation.Maša Galič, Tjerk Timan & Bert-Jaap Koops - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (1):9-37.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Physician Aid-in-Dying and Suicide Prevention in Psychiatry”.Margaret Pabst Battin & Brent M. Kious - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (10):W14-W17.
Appropriating Video Surveillance for Art and Environmental Awareness: Experiences from ARTiVIS.Mónica Mendes, Pedro Ângelo, Nuno Correia & Valentina Nisi - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (3):947-970.
studiVZ: social networking in the surveillance society. [REVIEW]Christian Fuchs - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):171-185.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethical Dimensions of Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies”.Karola V. Kreitmair - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (4):W1-W3.
Neither good, nor bad, but dangerous: Surveillance as an ethical paradox. [REVIEW]Graham Sewell & James R. Barker - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (3):181-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-19

Downloads
19 (#805,446)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What is a Bioethics of the Oppressed in the Age of COVID-19?Craig M. Klugman - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):29-31.
Advancing Data Justice in Public Health and Beyond.Lina Dencik - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):32-33.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Network Theory.Bruno Latour - 2005 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references