Hobbes’s Geometrical Optics

Hobbes Studies 29 (1):39-65 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

_ Source: _Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 39 - 65 Since Euclid, optics has been considered a geometrical science, which Aristotle defines as a “mixed” mathematical science. Hobbes follows this tradition and clearly places optics among physical sciences. However, modern scholars point to a confusion between geometry and physics and do not seem to agree about the way Hobbes mixes both sciences. In this paper, I return to this alleged confusion and intend to emphasize the peculiarity of Hobbes’s geometrical optics. This paper suggests that Hobbes’s conception of geometrical optics, as a mixed mathematical science, greatly differs from Descartes’s one, mainly because they do not share the same “mechanical conception of nature.” I will argue that Hobbes and Descartes also have in common the quest for a different kind of geometry for their optics, different from that of the Ancients. I will show that this departure is not recent since Hobbes’s approach is already evident in 1636, when he judges the demonstrations of his contemporary friends, Claude Mydorge and Walter Warner. Finally the paper broadly suggests what is noteworthy in Hobbes’s optics, that is, the importance of the idea of force in his mechanics, although he was not able to conceptualize it in other terms than “quickness.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Optics in Hobbes’s Natural Philosophy.Franco Giudice - 2016 - Hobbes Studies 29 (1):86-102.
The development of mersenne's optics.Daniele Cozzoli - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (1):pp. 9-25.
The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes.Tom Sorell (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leonardo, Optics and Ophthalmology.Dominique Raynaud - 2013 - In F. Fiorani & A. Nova (eds.), Leonardo da Vinci and Optics. Marsilio. pp. 255-276.
Kepler’s optics without hypotheses.Sven Dupré - 2012 - Synthese 185 (3):501-525.
Hobbes on Natural Philosophy as "True Physics" and Mixed Mathematics.Marcus P. Adams - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:43-51.
Families of bose rays in quantum optics.N. Mukunda, E. C. G. Sudarshan & R. Simon - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (3):277-306.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-29

Downloads
49 (#321,800)

6 months
14 (#174,667)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Imagination and Passions in Descartes and Hobbes.Guido Frilli - 2020 - Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg 48:193-225.
Hobbes and optics.Rodrigues Neto Guilherme - 2016 - Scientiae Studia 14 (2):435.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The power of images: mathematics and metaphysics in Hobbes's optics.Antoni Malet - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):303-333.
Hobbes et le mouvement de la lumière.Jean Bernhardt - 1977 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 30 (1):1-24.
6 Hobbes on light and vision.Jan Prins - 1996 - In Tom Sorell (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 129.
Derrière le miroir.Gérard Simon - 1981 - The Temps de la Réflexion 2:298.

Add more references