Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethical Responsibilities for Companies That Process Personal Data”

, &
American Journal of Bioethics 24 (3):1-5 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We’re grateful for the thoughtful and incisive commentaries on our article, “Ethical Responsibilities for Companies that Process Personal Data” (McCoy et al. 2023). In the article, we propose the E...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2024.2308129

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Diagnosis By Television Documentary: Professional Responsibilities in Informal Encounters”.Alistair Wardrope & Markus Reuber - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (12):12-14.
Responsible Processing and Sharing of Genomic Data: Bringing Health Technologies Industries to the Table.Bartha Maria Knoppers, Shane Chase, Yann Joly, Ma’N. Zawati & Adrian Thorogood - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (11):33-35.
No Means No: Respecting Dignity as the Fourth Principle of Ethical Data Extraction.Tessa Gavina & Alice Cavolo - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (11):59-60.
Applying the Ethical Data Practices Framework to Digital Therapeutics.Odia Kane & Kadija Ferryman - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (11):53-56.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethical Dimensions of Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies”.Karola V. Kreitmair - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (4):W1-W3.
Access to Expanded Prenatal Genetic Testing: Response to Open Peer Commentaries.Michelle J. Bayefsky & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (5):1-3.
Ethical Responsibilities for Companies That Process Personal Data.Matthew S. McCoy, Anita L. Allen, Katharina Kopp, Michelle M. Mello, D. J. Patil, Pilar Ossorio, Steven Joffe & Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (11):11-23.
A Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Patient and Citizen Participation in Health: The Need for Improved Ethical Support”.Laura Williamson - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (12):W1 - W5.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Neuroimaging Techniques for Memory Detection: Scientific, Ethical and Legal Issues".Daniel V. Meegan - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):1-4.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Misrepresenting ‘Usual Care’ in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error”.Ruth Macklin & Charles Natanson - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):W12-W14.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Corrigendum.[author unknown] - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (2):59-59.
E-Cigarettes, the FDA, Public Health, and Harm Reduction: A Response to the Open Peer Commentaries.Larisa Svirsky, Dana Howard & Micah L. Berman - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (1):1-4.
Technology Changes the Ethical Stakes in HIV Surveillance and Prevention: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Reassessing the Ethics of Molecular HIV Surveillance in the Era of Cluster Detection and Response”.Stephen Molldrem & Anthony K. J. Smith - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):W1-W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-13

Downloads
11 (#1,140,884)

6 months
11 (#241,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Digital Privacy and Data Protection: From Ethical Principles to Action.Ravi Gupta - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (11):24-26.

View all 13 references / Add more references