The underlying assumptions of electoral systems

Abstract

I propose a twofold classification of the main considerations underlying the choice of an election procedure: political criteria on the one hand, and social-choice criteria on the other. I formulate political dichotomies, each combination of which narrows down the choice of procedure to a sub-class of the class of all procedures. I discuss what social-choice theory has to offer in each of these

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Direct Proofs of Lindenbaum Conditionals.René Gazzari - 2014 - Logica Universalis 8 (3-4):321-343.
Ethics and responsibility in politics.Gene Sharp - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):304 – 317.
Rational choice theory as social physics.James Bernard Murphy - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (1-2):155-174.
Unrealistic assumptions in rational choice theory.Aki Lehtinen & Jaakko Kuorikoski - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2):115-138.
Electoral Reform in Asia: Institutional Engineering against 'Money Politics'.Olli Hellmann - 2014 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 15 (2):275-298.
Preferences over consumption and status.Alexander Vostroknutov - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (4):509-537.
Implementation without rationality assumptions.Ville Korpela - 2012 - Theory and Decision 72 (2):189-203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-04

Downloads
18 (#837,247)

6 months
3 (#984,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references