Direct Proofs of Lindenbaum Conditionals

Logica Universalis 8 (3-4):321-343 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We discuss the problem raised by Miller to re-prove the well-known equivalences of some Lindenbaum theorems for deductive systems without an application of the Axiom of Choice. We present five special constructions of deductive systems, each of them providing some partial solutions to the mathematical problem. We conclude with a short discussion of the underlying philosophical problem of deciding, whether a given proof satisfies our demand that the Axiom of Choice is not applied

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On generic extensions without the axiom of choice.G. P. Monro - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (1):39-52.
Cut-elimination for simple type theory with an axiom of choice.G. Mints - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):479-485.
Ultrapowers without the axiom of choice.Mitchell Spector - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4):1208-1219.
“The Strict Deduction System Is Impossible to Derive the Contradiction” And the Proof.Fang-Wen Yuan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 13:147-162.
Quantum logics and lindenbaum property.Roberto Giuntini - 1987 - Studia Logica 46 (1):17 - 35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-29

Downloads
30 (#532,397)

6 months
7 (#428,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Logic, semantics, metamathematics.Alfred Tarski - 1956 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press. Edited by John Corcoran & J. H. Woodger.
[Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
Set theory.Thomas Jech - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic.

View all 7 references / Add more references