Non enim ab hiis que sensus est iudicare sensum: Sensation and Thought in Theaetetus, Plotinus and Proclus

International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 8 (2):192-230 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I examine the relation between sensation and discursive thought in Plato, Plotinus, and Proclus. In Theaetetus, a soul whose highest faculty was sensation would have no unified experience of the sensible world, lacking universal ideas to give order to the sensible flux. It is implied that such universals are grasped by the soul’s thinking. In Plotinus the soul is not passive when it senses the world, but as the logos of all things it thinks the world through its own forms.Proclus argues against the derivation of universal logoi from the senses, which alone can’t make the sensible world comprehensible. At most they give a record of the original sense-impression in its particularity. The soul’s own projected logoi give the sensible world stability. For Proclus, bare sensation does not depend on thought, but a unified experience of the sense-world depends on its paradigmatic logoi in our souls.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Plotinus on the Making of Matter Part I: The Identity of Darkness.Denis O’Brien - 2011 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (1):6-57.
Plotinus on the soul's omnipresence in body.J. S. & M. Gary - 2008 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (2):113-127.
Apprehension of Thought in Ennead 4.3.30.D. M. Hutchinson - 2011 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (2):262-282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
22 (#712,004)

6 months
9 (#314,693)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?