- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Promoting Ethical Payment in Human Infection Challenge Studies
Holly Fernandez Lynch, Thomas C. Darton, Jae Levy, Frank McCormick, Ubaka Ogbogu, Ruth O. Payne, Alvin E. Roth, Akilah Jefferson Shah, Thomas Smiley & Emily A. Largent
American Journal of Bioethics 21 (3):11-31 (2021)
Abstract
To prepare for potential human infection challenge studies involving SARS-CoV-2, we convened a multidisciplinary working group to address ethical questions regarding whether and how much SAR...Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Judging the social value of controlled human infection studies.Annette Rid & Meta Roestenberg - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (8):749-763.
Ethical issues surrounding controlled human infection challenge studies in endemic low‐and middle‐income countries.Euzebiusz Jamrozik & Michael J. Selgelid - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (8):797-808.
The right to withdraw from controlled human infection studies: Justifications and avoidance.Holly Fernandez Lynch - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (8):833-848.
Ethical Criteria for Human Challenge Studies in Infectious Diseases: Table 1.Ben Bambery, Michael Selgelid, Charles Weijer, Julian Savulescu & Andrew J. Pollard - 2016 - Public Health Ethics 9 (1):92-103.
Compensating for research risk: permissible but not obligatory.Holly Fernandez Lynch & Emily A. Largent - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (12):827-828.
Reexamining the categorical exclusion of pediatric participants from controlled human infection trials.Sean C. Murphy, Devan M. Duenas, Thomas L. Richie & Seema K. Shah - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (8):785-796.
Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model.Olivia Grimwade, Julian Savulescu, Alberto Giubilini, Justin Oakley, Joshua Osowicki, Andrew J. Pollard & Anne-Marie Nussberger - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (12):815-826.
Payment in challenge studies from an economics perspective.Sandro Ambuehl, Axel Ockenfels & Alvin E. Roth - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (12):831-832.
Commentary on 'Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model'.Ruth Payne - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (12):829-830.
Coronavirus Human Infection Challenge Studies: Assessing Potential Benefits and Risks.Euzebiusz Jamrozik, George S. Heriot & Michael J. Selgelid - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (4):709-715.
Should practice and policy be revised to allow for risk-proportional payment to human challenge study participants?Euzebiusz Jamrozik & Michael J. Selgelid - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (12):835-836.
The role of community engagement in addressing bystander risks in research: The case of a Zika virus controlled human infection study.Seema K. Shah, Franklin Miller & Holly Fernandez Lynch - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (9):883-892.
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Human Challenge Trials: Too Risky, Too Soon.Liza Dawson, Jake Earl & Jeffrey Livezey - 2020 - Journal of Infectious Diseases 222 (3):514-516.
Psychosocial ethical aspects of AIDS.Michael W. Ross - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (2):74-81.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-02-05
Downloads
28 (#574,430)
6 months
16 (#163,630)
2021-02-05
Downloads
28 (#574,430)
6 months
16 (#163,630)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Paying for Fairness? Incentives and Fair Subject Selection.Douglas MacKay & Rebecca L. Walker - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (3):35-37.
Research Participants Should Be Rewarded Rather than “Compensated for Time and Burdens”.Joanna Różyńska - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (3):53-55.
Promoting Ethical Payments in Human Challenge Studies Conducted in LMICs: Are We Asking the Right Questions?Paul Ndebele & Adnan A. Hyder - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (3):51-53.
Considering the Importance of Context for Ethical Practice on Reimbursement, Compensation and Incentives for Volunteers in Human Infection Controlled Studies.Primus Che Chi, Esther Owino, Irene Jao, Vicki Marsh & Dorcas Kamuya - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (3):40-42.
Risk, benefit, and social value in Covid-19 human challenge studies: pandemic decision making in historical context.Mabel Rosenheck - 2022 - Monash Bioethics Review 40 (2):188-213.
References found in this work
Payment in challenge studies: ethics, attitudes and a new payment for risk model.Olivia Grimwade, Julian Savulescu, Alberto Giubilini, Justin Oakley, Joshua Osowicki, Andrew J. Pollard & Anne-Marie Nussberger - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (12):815-826.
Undue Inducement: Nonsense on Stilts?Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):9-13.
Compensation for Cures: Paying People to Participate in Challenge Studies.Jonathan Anomaly & Julian Savulescu - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (7):792-797.
Ethical Criteria for Human Challenge Studies in Infectious Diseases: Table 1.Ben Bambery, Michael Selgelid, Charles Weijer, Julian Savulescu & Andrew J. Pollard - 2016 - Public Health Ethics 9 (1):92-103.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c88c7cdf7-5t6bj uwo