Paraconsistent logic in The Office

The Philosophers' Magazine 42 (42):100-104 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Normally, we would accuse anyone who holds inconsistent beliefs of irrationality. However, Keenan apologists may claim that in some circumstances it does seem perfectly rational to hold inconsistent beliefs. And we are not alone in this assertion. A small band of philosophers, led most notably by Graham Priest, have also championed this cause, the cause of paraconsistency.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paraconsistent logic in The Office.Morgan Luck - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 42:100-104.
Rational irrationality.Alfred Mele - 2004 - The Philosophers' Magazine 26:31-32.
Semantic Dialetheism.Edwin Mares - 2004 - In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. pp. 264–275.
Rational irrationality.Alfred Mele - 2004 - The Philosophers' Magazine 26 (26):31-32.
Beliefs supporting belief. [REVIEW]Peter Williams - 1999 - The Philosophers' Magazine 7:56-57.
The Origins of Our Beliefs.Joshua DiPaolo & Robert Simpson - 2017 - The Philosophers' Magazine 78:90-93.
Beliefs supporting belief. [REVIEW]Peter Williams - 1999 - The Philosophers' Magazine 7 (7):56-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
69 (#242,399)

6 months
7 (#492,113)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Morgan Luck
Charles Sturt University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references