- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Examining how people reason about controversial scientific topics
Thinking and Reasoning 25 (2):231-255 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Scientific Facts and Methods in Public Reason.Karin Jønch-Clausen & Klemens Kappel - 2016 - Res Publica 22 (2):117-133.
Reason, Liberalism, and Democratic Education: A Deweyan Approach to Teaching About Homosexuality.John E. Petrovic - 2013 - Educational Theory 63 (5):525-541.
Reason, Liberalism, and Democratic Education: A Deweyan Approach to Teaching About Homosexuality.John E. Petrovic - 2013 - Educational Theory 63 (5):525-541.
Could gambling save science? Encouraging an honest consensus.Robin Hanson - 1995 - Social Epistemology 9 (1):3-33.
How Should Creationism and Intelligent Design be Dealt with in the Classroom?Michael J. Reiss - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):399-415.
Ens rationis from Suárez to Caramuel: a study in scholasticism of the Baroque Era.Daniel Novotny - 2013 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Testimony and Belief.Theodore Joseph Everett - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
How to be realistic about folk psychology.George Graham & Terence Horgan - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):69-81.
Introduction.Jonathan Cohen - 2007 - In Jonathan Cohen & Brian McLaughlin (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
What exactly is the scientific method and why do so many people get it wrong?Peter Ellerton - 2017 - Australian Humanist, The 125:14.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-10-26
Downloads
24 (#662,338)
6 months
1 (#1,478,830)
2018-10-26
Downloads
24 (#662,338)
6 months
1 (#1,478,830)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
An examination of the underlying dimensional structure of three domains of contaminated mindware: paranormal beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, and anti-science attitudes.Jala Rizeq, David B. Flora & Maggie E. Toplak - 2021 - Thinking and Reasoning 27 (2):187-211.
Factors Predicting Willingness to Share COVID-19 Misinformation.Emilio J. C. Lobato, Maia Powell, Lace M. K. Padilla & Colin Holbrook - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
References found in this work
Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief.Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Paul Seli, Derek J. Koehler & Jonathan A. Fugelsang - 2012 - Cognition 123 (3):335-346.
Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making.Andreas Glöckner & Cilia Witteman - 2010 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (1):1 – 25.
Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making.Cilia Witteman & Andreas Glöckner - 2010 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (1):1-25.
Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing.Keith E. Stanovich & Maggie E. Toplak - 2012 - Mind and Society 11 (1):3-13.
How convenient! The epistemic rationale of self-validating belief systems.Maarten Boudry & Johan Braeckman - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (3):341-364.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c88c7cdf7-qczmr uwo