Ens rationis from Suárez to Caramuel: a study in scholasticism of the Baroque Era

New York: Fordham University Press (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this groundbreaking book, Daniel D. Novotny explores one of the most controversial topics of Suarez's philosophy: "beings of reason." Beings of reason are impossible intentional objects, such as blindness and square-circle.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2022

Call number

BD111.N68 2013

ISBN(s)

9780823244768

DOI

10.1515/9780823291465
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Chapters

4 Suárez’s Objectualism: The Causes of Beings of Reason

Conclusion: Lessons from the History of Philosophy

Notes

Bibliography

6 Hurtado’s Fallibilism

2 Problems Posed by Beings of Reason

8 Caramuel’s Linguistic Eliminativism

Index

Appendix: Outlines of the Treatises

7 Mastri/Belluto’s Modifi ed Objectualism

3 Suárez’s Objectualism: The Nature of Beings of Reason

1 Scholasticism of the Baroque Era

5 Suárez’s Objectualism: The Division of Beings of Reason

Similar books and articles

Metaphysics. Shadows of being: Francisco Suarez's 'Entia Rationis'.Christopher Shields - 2012 - In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oxford University Press.
In Defense of Baroque Scholasticism: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism.Daniel D. Novotný - 2009 - Studia Neoaristotelica 6 (2):209-233.
The Translation of Terms like "Ens Rationis".Robert W. Schmidt - 1963 - Modern Schoolman 41 (1):73-75.
Ens inquantum ens. The Notion of Being as Such as the Object of Metaphysics According to the Doctrine of John Duns Scotus. [REVIEW]Harald Holz - 1981 - Philosophy and History 14 (1):16-17.
The changing role ofentia rationis in mediaeval semantics and ontology: A comparative study with a reconstruction.Gyula Klima - 1993 - Synthese 96 (1):25 - 58.
The Primacy of Semiosis: an ontology of relations.Paul Bains - 2006 - University of Toronto Press.
Descartes's conceptual distinction and its ontological import.Justin Skirry - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2):121-144.
Report of the Caramuel Conference 2006. [REVIEW]Daniel Dominik Novotný - 2006 - Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (2):191-195.
The Meaning of 'Ens Commune' in the Thought of Thomas Aquinas.Gaven Kerr - 2008 - Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2008:32 - 60.
Suárez and the Latent Essentialism of Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology.Oliva Blanchette - 1999 - Review of Metaphysics 53 (1):3 - 19.
Francisco suárez on consent and political obligation.Daniel Schwartz - 2008 - Vivarium 46 (1):59-81.
Entia Rationis and Second Intentions.John of St Thomas - 1949 - New Scholasticism 23 (4):395-413.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-26

Downloads
48 (#316,781)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel D. Novotný
University Of South Bohemia

Citations of this work

Spinoza and the Logical Limits of Mental Representation.Galen Barry - 2019 - Journal of Modern Philosophy 1 (1):5.
Jesuit Probabilistic Logic between Scholastic and Academic Philosophy.Miroslav Hanke - 2019 - History and Philosophy of Logic 40 (4):355-373.
Descartes on Will and Suspension of Judgment: Affectivity of the Reasons for Doubt.Jan Forsman - 2017 - In Gábor Boros, Judit Szalai & Oliver Istvan Toth (eds.), The Concept of Affectivity in Early Modern Philosophy. Budapest, Hungary: pp. 38-58.
A Spinozist Aesthetics of Affect and Its Political Implications.Christopher Davidson - 2017 - In Gábor Boros, Judit Szalai & Oliver Istvan Toth (eds.), The Concept of Affectivity in Early Modern Philosophy. Budapest, Hungary: Eötvös Loránd University Press. pp. 185-206.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references