Theories of Legal Argumentation and Concepts of Law an Approximation

European University Institute (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Theories of Legal Argumentation and Concepts of Law. An Approximation.Massimo La Torre - 2002 - Ratio Juris 15 (4):377-402.
The Distributivity on Bi-Approximation Semantics.Tomoyuki Suzuki - 2016 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 57 (3):411-430.
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
Legal Argumentation and Theories of Adjudication in the U.S. Legal Tradition: A Critical View of Cass Sunstein’s Minimalism, Richard Posner’s Pragmatism and Ronald Dworkin’s Advocacy of Integrity.Bernardo Fernandes - unknown - In Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. Cham: Imprint: Springer.
Dudas razonables, sesgos cognitivos y emociones en la argumentación jurídica.María G. Navarro - 2010 - Bajo Palabra. Revista de Filosofía 5:203-214.
The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.
Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines in common law of contract.Phan Minh Dung & Phan Minh Thang - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (3):167-182.
Pluralismo argomentativo. Sull’argomentazione dell’interpretazione.Mauro Barberis - 2006 - Etica E Politica 8 (1):1-21.
Legal Practices and the Reason of the Law.Kurt Nutting - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (1):111-133.
The Rational Reconstruction of Argumentation Referring to Consequences and Purposes in the Application of Legal Rules: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Eveline T. Feteris - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):459-470.
Argumentation in ethics, legal dogmatics and legal practice.Aleksander Peczenik - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):747-756.
Critical Legal Studies and argumentation theory.Dale A. Herbeck - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):719-729.
Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999). [REVIEW]William Twining - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):223-229.
Pragmatic argumentation and the application of legal rules.Eveline T. Feteris - unknown
Reconstructing Complex Analogy Argumentation in Judicial Decisions: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Harm Kloosterhuis - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):471-483.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Massimo La Torre
University of Hull

Citations of this work

Conflitos entre direitos e alternativas à ponderação. A teoria dos direitos de Dworkin reavaliada.Marina Velasco - 2011 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 10 (3):115-130.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references