Legal Argumentation and Theories of Adjudication in the U.S. Legal Tradition: A Critical View of Cass Sunstein’s Minimalism, Richard Posner’s Pragmatism and Ronald Dworkin’s Advocacy of Integrity

In Christian Dahlman & Thomas Bustamante (eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation. Cham: Imprint: Springer ()
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dworkin on the value of integrity.Jonathan Crowe - 2007 - Deakin Law Review 12:167.
Richard Posner's democratic pragmatism and the problem of ignorance.Ilya Somin - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (1):1-22.
The voice of the people in the legal reasoning of Cass Sunstein.David van Mill - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):152-156.
Legal philosophy in America.Brian Bix - 2008 - In Cheryl Misak (ed.), The Oxford handbook of American philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Circumstances of Integrity.Jeremy Waldron - 1997 - Legal Theory 3 (1):1-22.
Constitutional Interpretation.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1989 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Legal Pragmatism.Richard A. Posner - 2004 - Metaphilosophy 35 (1-2):147-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references