The effect of intensity of the preexposed stimulus on subsequent conditioning

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (4):381-383 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03337222

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reduced stimulus intensity as a cs in gsr conditioning.R. A. Champion - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (4p1):631.
Amount of conditioning and intensity of conditioned stimulus.Herbert D. Kimmel - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (4):283.
Stimulus generalization as a function of UCS intensity in eyelid conditioning.John J. Porter - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):311.
Level of conditioning and intensity of the adaptation stimulus.Janet A. Taylor - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (2):127.
Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: II. The conditioned galvanic skin response to an auditory stimulus.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (1):35.
Intensity of conditioned stimulus and rate of conditioning.L. F. Carter - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (6):481.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.William F. Prokasy Jr, David A. Grant & Nancy A. Myers - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):242.
Intertrial responding and CS intensity in classical eyelid conditioning.Michaela Mattson & John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):396.
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the frequency and intensity of auditory CSs.John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):250.
Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: I. The conditioned eyelid response to light.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (6):690.
Latent inhibition in human eyelid conditioning.Paul Schnur & Charles J. Ksir - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):388.
Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
Learning and performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of intensity of the UCS.Kenneth W. Spence - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1):57.
Conditioned stimulus intensity and temporal factors in spaced-trial classical conditioning.Gerald W. Barnes - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (3):192.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
16 (#908,012)

6 months
9 (#309,818)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Habituation: A dual-process theory.Philip M. Groves & Richard F. Thompson - 1970 - Psychological Review 77 (5):419-450.
Latent inhibition in human eyelid conditioning.Paul Schnur & Charles J. Ksir - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):388.

Add more references