Level of conditioning and intensity of the adaptation stimulus

Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (2):127 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0042941

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reduced stimulus intensity as a cs in gsr conditioning.R. A. Champion - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (4p1):631.
Stimulus Intensity and Adaptation Level As Determinants of Simple Reaction Time.David L. Kohfeld - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (3p1):468.
Amount of conditioning and intensity of conditioned stimulus.Herbert D. Kimmel - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (4):283.
Stimulus generalization as a function of UCS intensity in eyelid conditioning.John J. Porter - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):311.
Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: II. The conditioned galvanic skin response to an auditory stimulus.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (1):35.
Intensity of conditioned stimulus and rate of conditioning.L. F. Carter - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (6):481.
Disinhibition in GSR conditioning as a function of the number of CS-UCS trials and temporal location of the novel stimulus.H. D. Kimmel & W. A. Greene - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (6):567.
Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.William F. Prokasy Jr, David A. Grant & Nancy A. Myers - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):242.
Forward conditioning, backward conditioning, pseudoconditioning, and adaptation to the conditioned stimulus.J. D. Harris - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (6):491.
Intertrial responding and CS intensity in classical eyelid conditioning.Michaela Mattson & John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):396.
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the frequency and intensity of auditory CSs.John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):250.
Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: I. The conditioned eyelid response to light.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (6):690.
Children's escape conditioning and prior number of adaptation trials to the noxious stimulus.R. K. Penney & E. M. Penney - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):196.
Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
19 (#821,503)

6 months
5 (#703,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Learned and perceived reinforcer response strengths and image theory.Donald L. King - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (5):438-441.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references