Philosophical Foundations of Judicial Review

In David Dyzenhaus (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 265-282 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Judicial Interpretation to Judge-Made Law (2nd edition).Christopher Wolfe - 1994 - Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Judicial Review Without Rights: Some Problems for the Democratic Legitimacy of Structural Judicial Review.Adrienne Stone - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1):1-32.
Constitutional Dialogue and the Justification of Judicial Review.T. R. S. Allan - 2003 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (4):563-584.
Is judicial review undemocratic?Annabelle Lever - 2009 - Perspectives on Politics 7 (4):897-915.
On the Value of Constitutions and Judicial Review.Laura Valentini - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (4):817-832.
Making Friends of Old Enemies: A Communitarian Defense of Judicial Review.John-Otto Phillips - 2010 - Gnosis 11 (1):1-15.
Rights-based judicial review: A democratic justification. [REVIEW]Alon Harel - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):247-276.
Judicial Power and American Character: Censoring Ourselves in an Anxious Age.Robert F. Nagel - 1994 - Oxford University Press USA.
The Responsible judge: readings in judicial ethics.John Thomas Noonan & Kenneth I. Winston (eds.) - 1993 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
In the Shadow of Judicial Supremacy: Putting the Idea of Judicial Dialogue in Its Place.Ming-Sung Kuo - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (1):83-104.
Democracy and judicial review: are they really incompatible?Annabelle Lever - 2007 - Public Law:280-298.
Judicial Review in Context: A Response to Counter-majoritarian and Epistemic Critiques.Marcus Schulzke & Amanda Carroll - 2011 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 58 (127):1-23.
Judicial Review in Context: A Response to Counter-majoritarian and Epistemic Critiques.Marcus Schulzke & Amanda Carroll - 2011 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 58:1-23.
The common law, shared power and judicial review.Craig Paul - 2004 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2):237-257.
Judicial review and its discontents: Is judicial review democratically legitimate?Torstein Sverre Hoff - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-14

Downloads
373 (#54,139)

6 months
73 (#65,454)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cristina Lafont
Northwestern University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references