Brave New World

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):20-31 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article focuses on the crucial changes that science as an established social institution and an epistemological enterprise is undergoing, the key one is the loss of its monopoly on the production of socially useful knowledge and gradual transformation into something new, which, due to institutional and cultural reasons, we continue to call ‘science’. We suppose that the most appropriate conceptualization of the new phenomenon, which is replacing science as an institution, is “technoscience”, since the technical component in scientific practices has now taken a dominant position and technology production has become more important than fundamental knowledge. Technoscience has at least two sources: 1) capitalization of scientific activity that has led to classical science has been replaced with technoscience developing on first-priority funded applied research; 2) theorization and autonomy of the techno sphere, which have resulted in instrumentalization of all levels of knowledge production as well as in technological / symbolic construction of reality and tangled ontology of technoscientific objects. We discuss both of these sources, with particular attention being paid to such trends as epistemic strategies transformation, modified reality, social sciences and humanities conformation to technoscience norms, and knowledge bearers egalitarianization. A crucial transformation of both science itself and its position in society breaks inevitably a demarcation line that separates scientific knowledge from other types of knowledge while promotes the replacement of scientific theory with discourses. Apparently, in “technoscience” an ethos of its own is being formed, where interaction with the “external environment” (with other social spheres) is crucial. In this context, scientific activity is becoming more and more transepistemic, transinstitutional practice, and accordingly ceases to be guided by the classical scientific ethos determined by the goals and objectives of academic community itself.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Technoscience: “Where the Danger Is, Grows the Saving Power Also”.Lada V. Shipovalova - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):45-50.
Technoscience, Biopolitics and Biobanking.Stanislav M. Gavrilenko - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):38-44.
Science in Danger, or Technoscience Becomes Dangerous?Olga B. Koshovets & Igor E. Frolov - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):51-58.
Technoscience – Science Without Scientists?Taras A. Varkhotov - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):32-37.
Social and humanitarian dimensions of technoscience.Alexandra Argamakova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):120-136.
Reflections on science and technoscience.Hugh Lacey - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):103-128.
Production of knowledge about the knowledge.Olga Koshovets - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):40-46.
Civil expertise of scientific knowledge in the digital era.Natalia V. Grishechkina & Sofia V. Tikhonova - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):123-138.
The Turn in Social Investigations of Scientific Knowledge.Lyudmila A. Markova - 2017 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 55 (1):26-36.
Scientific knowledge: a sociological analysis.Barry Barnes - 1996 - London: Athlone. Edited by David Bloor & John Henry.
The philosophical impact of technoscience or the development of a pragmatic philosophy of science.Ramón Queraltó - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):113-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-16

Downloads
11 (#1,136,567)

6 months
5 (#637,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references