Reflections on the historical, epistemological, and social meaning of technoscience

Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):129-139 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Technoscientific research, a kind of scientific research conducted within the decontextualized approach (DA), uses advanced technology to produce instruments, experimental objects, and new objects and structures, that enable us to gain knowledge of states of affairs of novel domains, especially knowledge about new possibilities of what we can do and make, with the horizons of practical, industrial, medical or military innovation, and economic growth and competition, never far removed from view. The legitimacy of technoscientific innovations can be appraised only in the course of considering fully what sorts of objects technoscientific objects are: objects that embody scientific knowledge confirmed within DA; physical/chemical/biological objects, realizations of possibilities discovered in research conducted within DA, brought to realization by means of technical/experimental/instrumental interventions; and components of social/ecological systems, objects that embody the values of technological progress and (most of them) values of capital and the market. What technoscientific objects are - their powers, tendencies, sources of their being, effects on human beings and social/economic systems, how they differ from non technoscientific objects - cannot be grasped from technoscientific inquiry alone; scientific inquiry that is not reducible to that conducted within DA is also needed. The knowledge that underlies and explains the efficacy of technoscientific objects is never sufficient to grasp what sorts of object they are and could become. Science cannot be reduced to technoscience

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward an epistemology of nano-technosciences.Jan C. Schmidt - 2011 - Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):103-124.
The philosophical impact of technoscience or the development of a pragmatic philosophy of science.Ramón Queraltó - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):113-125.
Reflections on science and technoscience.Hugh Lacey - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):103-128.
Elusive memories of technoscience.Barry Barnes - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (2):142-165.
Castoriadis's ontology: being and creation.Suzi Adams - 2011 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Reflections on meaning.Paul Horwich - 2005 - New York : Oxford University Press,: Clarendon Press ;.
Matters of Interest: The Objects of Research in Science and Technoscience. [REVIEW]Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent, Sacha Loeve, Alfred Nordmann & Astrid Schwarz - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):365-383.
Deference and the Use Theory.Michael Devitt - 2011 - ProtoSociology 27:196-211.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-12

Downloads
37 (#434,989)

6 months
6 (#531,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dialectic of enlightenment: philosophical fragments.Max Horkheimer - 2002 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Theodor W. Adorno & Gunzelin Schmid Noerr.

Add more references