Rights and Responsibilities

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (3):271-280 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As an alternative to rights theory, John Ladd proposes an ethics of responsibility based on interpersonal relationships. These relationships, described as friendships, are personal in nature, founded on trust, and obtain between doctor and patient, parent and child, etc. Ladd presents his views in a most appealing way – helping the needy, being friends with the doctor. We argue that Ladd's ethics of responsibility is plausible only because he ignores the facts of power which rights theory was designed to take into account, and that rights and the corresponding institutional model of medicine are indeed appropriate to the physician/patient relationship

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-14

Downloads
28 (#584,743)

6 months
9 (#351,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Participants' responsibilities in clinical research.David B. Resnik & Elizabeth Ness - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (12):746-750.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references