On the Logic of Eternal Knowledge

Modern Schoolman 68 (2):163-169 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00268402

DOI

10.5840/schoolman199168218

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Kelly on the Logic of Eternal Knowledge.James E. Taylor - 1990 - Modern Schoolman 67 (2):141-147.
The Logic of Eternal Knowledge from the Standpoint of the Aristotelian Syllogistic.Charles J. Kelly - 1988 - Modern Schoolman 66 (1):29-54.
CHAPTER 6. Eternal Recurrence in Inner-Mental Life. Eternal-Recurrence as Describing the Conditions for Knowledge and Pleasure.Peter Bornedal - 2010 - In The Surface and the Abyss: Nietzsche as Philosopher of Mind and Knowledge. Walter de Gruyter.
Kelly on the Logic of Eternal Knowledge.James E. Taylor - 1990 - Modern Schoolman 67 (2):141-147.
Change and the eternal part of the mind in Spinoza.Michael Lebuffe - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):369-384.
Evolution as algorithm.Daniel C. Dennett - unknown
In what sense there is no science of corruptible things: an analysis of Posterior Analytics I 8.Lucas Angioni - 2009 - Cadernos de História E Filosofia da Ciéncia 19 (1):61-87.
Some Problems in the Logic of Scientific Knowledge.P. V. Tavanets & V. S. Shvyrev - 1962 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 1 (3):33-41.
Eternal sentences.Stephen H. Voss & Charles Sayward - 1976 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):14 – 23.
Probabilities, causation, and logic programming in conditional reasoning: reply to Stenning and Van Lambalgen.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2016 - Thinking and Reasoning 22 (3):336-354.
Review: Julius R. Weinberg, On `This is White.': A Rejoinder. [REVIEW]Charles A. Baylis - 1941 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 6 (3):103-103.
It Depends on What One Means by “Eternal”: Why Boethius is not an Eternalist.Michael Wiitala - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:253-261.
A rejoinder to the Danapur rejoinder.Raymond Wilson - 1984 - British Journal of Educational Studies 32 (1):55-57.
A Rejoinder to the Danapur Rejoinder.Raymond Wilson - 1984 - British Journal of Educational Studies 32 (1):55 - 57.
Consequentialism, Incoherence and Choice.Peter Simpson & Robert McKim - 1992 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 66 (1):93-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
18 (#852,762)

6 months
3 (#1,029,281)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references