How IRBs make decisions: should we worry if they disagree?

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):230-230 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is at present, far too little empirical research into the actual decision-making process of Institutional Review Boards and it is sobering to be reminded by Robert Klitzman's article that while theoretical debates might rage and prove fertile ground for new theories and better ways of approaching research ethics; ethics committee members must try to make sense of these concepts and apply them in very practical situations.1 Klitzman provides important insights into the ….

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Us irbs confronting research in the developing world.Robert L. Klitzman - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (2):63-73.
Views and Experiences of IRBs Concerning Research Integrity.Robert Klitzman - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):513-528.
Research ethics committees: A regional approach.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):161-179.
Dementia and dignity: Towards a new method of surrogate decision making.Elysa R. Koppelman - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):65 – 85.
Comments on Richard Jeffrey.Terry M. Goode - 1975 - Synthese 30 (1-2):135 - 138.
Betrayal aversion is reasonable.Jonathan J. Koehler & Andrew D. Gershoff - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):556-557.
What we worry about when we worry about the ethics of clinical research.David Wendler - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (3):161-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-01

Downloads
54 (#298,138)

6 months
12 (#223,634)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?