Betrayal aversion is reasonable

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):556-557 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We accept Sunstein's claim that people often use moral heuristics to make judgments and decisions. However, in situations that include a risk of betrayal, we disagree with Sunstein about when the relevant moral heuristic may be said to “misfire.” We suggest that the moral heuristic people apply to avoid the possibility of safety-product betrayal may be reasonable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Politics as a moral problem.János Kis - 2008 - New York: CEU Press.
Moral judgments in narrative contexts.Richard J. Gerrig - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):550-550.
Cognitivism, controversy, and moral heuristics.Matthew D. Adler - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):542-543.
Moral heuristics.Cass R. Sunstein - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):531-542.
Loss Aversion and Bargaining.Jonathan Shalev - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (3):201-232.
Regulation of risks.Paul Weirich - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):564-565.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#488,740)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references