The Interpretations of the Parable of Dives and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31) by Cardinal Hugh of St. Cher (†1263) and Cardinal Bonaventure of Bagnoregio [Book Review]

Franciscan Studies 78 (1):67-108 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In three previous articles2 I have investigated St. Bonaventure of Bagnoregio's dependence on and independence from Hugh of St. Cher in his Commentary on the Gospel of Luke. I concluded that Bonaventure creatively borrowed from Hugh.3 In those studies I began with Bonaventure's text and looked backwards at the commentary of his older contemporary. In this study I begin with Hugh's commentary and see what Bonaventure creatively adapted, abridged or omitted from it. From many possible texts in Luke's Gospel I have selected Luke 16:19-31, the parable of Lazarus and the rich man, which by the 13th century had a rich interpretive tradition. For example, Gregory the Great had dedicated his fortieth homily to it. John...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Civil Obligation in Bonaventure and Late Twentieth-Century Anarchists.Christopher Berry Gray - 2011 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):203-212.
St. Bonaventure and the Problem of Doctrinal Development.John R. White - 2011 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):177-202.
Bonaventure: Muslim Perspectives.Christopher M. Cullen - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Bonaventure’s Proof of Trinity.Christopher B. Gray - 1993 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67 (2):201-217.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-04

Downloads
10 (#1,197,378)

6 months
2 (#1,204,205)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references