When Pretence can be Beneficial

Theory and Decision 48 (1):85-99 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper examines when unilateral and bilateral pretence may be beneficial distinguishing between positive and negative externalities. Using a two-player single period game and defining altruism, selfishness and meanness as "sentimental continuity" it is shown how the optimal level of the pretended sentimentality is determined. The novelty of the model is that the optimal degree of altruism (meanness) depends on the extent of the positive (negative) externalities

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The autism objection to pretence theories.David Liggins - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):764-782.
Pain behavior and the pretence of knowledge.Kenneth M. Prkachin - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):470-470.
Wittgenstein on the Fallacy of the Argument from Pretence.Edoardo Zamuner (ed.) - 2004 - Contributions of the Austrian Wittgenstein Society.
Altruism and selfishness.Howard Rachlin - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):239-250.
The Institution of Property.David Schmidtz - 1994 - Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (2):42-62.
Abstract Artifacts in Pretence.Sarah Sawyer - 2002 - Philosophical Papers 31 (2):183-198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
40 (#400,484)

6 months
2 (#1,206,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references