Individual differences in cortical face selectivity predict behavioral performance in face recognition

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:86621 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, object selectivity is defined as a higher neural response to an object category than other object categories. Importantly, object selectivity is widely considered as a neural signature of a functionally-specialized area in processing its preferred object category in the human brain. However, the behavioral significance of the object selectivity remains unclear. In the present study, we used the individual differences approach to correlate participants’ face selectivity in the face-selective regions with their behavioral performance in face recognition measured outside the scanner in a large sample of healthy adults. Face selectivity was defined as the z score of activation with the contrast of faces versus non-face objects, and the face recognition ability was indexed as the normalized residual of the accuracy in recognizing previously-learned faces after regressing out that for non-face objects in an old/new memory task. We found that the participants with higher face selectivity in the fusiform face area (FFA) and the occipital face area (OFA), but not in the posterior part of the superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), possessed higher face recognition ability. Importantly, the association of face selectivity in the FFA and face recognition ability cannot be accounted for by FFA response to objects or behavioral performance in object recognition, suggesting that the association is domain-specific. Finally, the association is reliable, confirmed by the replication from another independent participant group. In sum, our finding provides empirical evidence on the validity of using object selectivity as a neural signature in defining object-selective regions in the human brain.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Face recognition is not unique: Evidence from individual differences.V. Church & E. Winograd - 1986 - In H. Ellis, M. Jeeves, F. Newcombe & Andrew W. Young (eds.), Aspects of Face Processing. Martinus Nijhoff. pp. 71--77.
Automatic Attendance Monitoring System.P. Padma Rekha, V. Narendhiran, D. Amudhan, S. Ramya & N. Pavithra - 2016 - International Journal for Science and Advance Research in Technology 2 (2):23-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
24 (#661,868)

6 months
15 (#173,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

References found in this work

Looking at upside-down faces.Robert K. Yin - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):141.
Parts and wholes in face recognition.J. W. Tanaka & M. J. Farah - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):520-520.

Add more references