Mapping Communicative Activity: A CHAT Approach to Design of Pseudo- Intelligent Mediators for Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 17 (1):05-38 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The development of AAC technologies is of critical importance to the many people who are unable to speak intelligibly due to a communication disorder, and to their many everyday interlocutors. Advances in digital technologies have revolutionized AAC, leading to devices that can “speak for” such individuals as aptly as it is illustrated in the case of the world famous physicist, Stephen Hawking. However, given their dependence on prefabricated language, current AAC devices are very limited in their ability to mediate everyday interactions. We argue here that the limits of AAC are firstly theoretical — grounded in prosthetic models that imagine AAC devices as replacements for damaged body parts and in transmission models of language production as communication. In contrast, our multidisciplinary team aims to design pseudo-intelligent mediators of communication by blending strengths of human mediators with features of current AAC technologies. To inform the design process, we report here our initial situated studies focusing on the distributed nature of everyday communicative activities conducted with potential AAC/PIM users. Our analysis focuses on the discursive alignments of these participants and their interlocutors, attending especially to the various ways their personal aides function as human mediators. Specifically, we focus on mapping the communicative activity around each of these differently-abled individuals as they navigated a university campus. We profile the everyday interactional patterns within functional systems and across settings, and present close discourse analysis of one interaction to highlight the diverse roles personal aides adopted in mediating communication. Finally, we argue that attending to differently “abled” bodies as they move through everyday communicative environments pushes CHAT to more fully theorize physicality, individual mobilities, and the roles of bodies in the laminated assemblage of functional systems.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do They Speak Language?Lucie Čadková - 2015 - Biosemiotics 8 (1):9-27.
Inteligencia ambiental.María G. Navarro - 2011 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 15:184-205.
Communication and Semantics.A. A. Brudnyi - 1973 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 11 (4):398-411.
Communication and rationality.Georg Meggle - 2002 - Manuscrito 25 (2):291-312.
Sincerity, Honesty, and Communicative Truthfulness.Anne Ozar - 2013 - Philosophy Today 57 (4):343-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-27

Downloads
10 (#1,215,669)

6 months
2 (#1,248,257)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Editorial.Pernille Hviid - 2017 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 18 (1):1-4.

Add more citations