Anchoring: The Underestimated Manipulation of Decisions

Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 109 (2):246-258 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Anchoring” is a tactic used to manipulate negotiation outcomes. It exploits the fact that people base their estimates of unknown quantities on initial values. If they are given these initial values, their estimations are influened by them. We will address whether there is a rational justification for people to be manipulated by anchoring. We will also look at how to recognize in a negotiation situation whether the anchor effect is being used against you, how to use the anchor effect to your benefit, or at least how to defuse it if it is being used against you.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Old Is the New New: The Rhetoric of Anchoring Innovation.Ineke Sluiter - 2021 - In Ronny Boogaart, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen (eds.), The Language of Argumentation. Springer Verlag. pp. 243-260.
Anchoring versus Grounding: Reply to Schaffer.Brian Epstein - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (3):768-781.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-03

Downloads
17 (#894,534)

6 months
6 (#588,245)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references