Feature-placing Sentences and the Canonical Scheme

Abstracta 4 (2):30-42 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Feature-placing sentences are often confused with the general sentences in the canonical predicate calculus. The confusion is largely caused by their perceived commonality that both lack the subject-predicate form. In this paper, I offer some clarification of the fundamental differences between the two: the general sentences of the canonical predicate calculus contain predicates and variables which take individual objects as their values, and it is the sense of predication implied by the existence of predicates in these general sentences that is completely absent in feature-placing sentences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-05

Downloads
73 (#224,967)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Four ontologies.Eddy M. Zemach - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (8):231-247.
Theories of matter.Henry Laycock - 1975 - Synthese 31 (3-4):411 - 442.
What is Existence?Thomas P. Flint & C. J. F. Williams - 1984 - Philosophical Review 93 (1):131.
What is Existence?C. J. F. Williams - 1984 - Mind 93 (369):146-149.

View all 7 references / Add more references