Aquinas, Pseudo-Denys, Proclus and Isaiah VI.6

Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 64:59-93 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aquinas contradicts Isaiah VI. 6 because of his following of the ps. Dionysius, who is in turn reproducing the logical structures of Iamblichus and Proclus. These came to prevail despite doubts raised by earlier medieval theologians with the exception of Eriugena. Here are considered Thomas’ principles of biblical interpretation and the character of his Aristotelianism. His thought is shown to be a form of neoplatonic systematizing as developed by Iamblichus and Proclus.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pseudo-Dionysius and the Metaphysics of Aquinas.Richard C. Taylor - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (3):456-458.
Nouveaux liens objectifs entre le Pseudo-Denys et Proclus.H. Saffrey - 1979 - Revue des Sciences Philosophiques Et Théologiques 63 (1):3.
Das Böse im Platonismus.Gerald Bechtle - 1999 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 4 (1):63-82.
Proclus and the neoplatonic syllogistic.John N. Martin - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (3):187-240.
Iamblichus' egyptian neoplatonic theology in de mysteriis.Dennis Clark - 2008 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (2):164-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-27

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references