Everyday Life and Public Elementary School in Brazil: A Critical Psychological Intervention Model

Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 16 (2):71-87 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Brazil has one of the highest levels of economic disparity in the world. The educational system plays a large role in this reality, acting as a mechanism of social exclusion. Neoliberalism has resulted in the commodification of education, empowering private schools while undermining the public system. This has created a vicious cycle, whereby educational inequality reflects and reinforces social inequality. Such a system violates the rights of children not lucky enough to be born into wealth – the right to equal education; to equal opportunity; and equal treatment. From within this context, we propose a model, dubbed The Eagle’s Flight, for psychological intervention in public schools. This will form an extension of our research group’s Psychosocial Assessment and Intervention – Prevention, Community and Liberation, which has been an on-going project for the past fourteen years. The intervention model advocates monitoring child development from a critical, social and historical perspective, focusing on how school and community affect everyday life. The analysis will be carried out via the daily immersion of psychologists in the public school setting, who pay attention to key aspects which include various expressions of violence, financial difficulties related to unemployment, informal employment or drug dealing, poor access to health services, and the developmental impact of factors such as poverty. Based on Paulo Freire's Emancipatory Education Proposal and Ignacio Martín-Baró’s Liberation Psychology, intervention in school and community must be an interdisciplinary procedure, employing professionals from a range of disciplines involved in the study of child development. The various subjects’ perspectives seek to provide support for everyday problems and solutions, whilst breaking down the hegemonic model of psychological practice that considers the child and family as responsible for their problems. A concrete example of this critical psychosocial intervention model is presented.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Chronic mental illness and the limits of the biopsychosocial model.Dirk Richter - 1999 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (1):21-30.
The Development of Life Education in Taiwan.Li-yen Chen - 2004 - Philosophy and Culture 31 (9):21-46.
The school and society.John Dewey - 1930 - London: Feffer & Simons. Edited by Jo Ann Boydston & John Dewey.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-31

Downloads
28 (#574,430)

6 months
6 (#531,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ana Moreira
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais

References found in this work

Principles of Dialectical Psychology.C. Ratner - 1971 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1971 (9):83-109.

Add more references