Why so little faith? A reply to Blanton and Jaccard's (2006) skeptical view of testing pure multiplicative theories: Postcript

, , &
Psychological Review 113 (1):180-180 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.113.1.180

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Why so little faith? A reply to Blanton and Jaccard's (2006) skeptical view of testing pure multiplicative theories.Anthony G. Greenwald, Laurie A. Rudman, Brian A. Nosek & Vivian Zayas - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (1):170-180.
Postscript: Perspectives on the Reply by Greenwald, Rudman, Nosek, and Zayas (2006).Hart Blanton & James Jaccard - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (1):166-169.
Tests of multiplicative models in psychology: A case study using the unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.Hart Blanton & James Jaccard - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (1):155-166.
The Skeptical Christian.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 8:142-167.
The will to imagine: a justification of skeptical religion.J. L. Schellenberg - 2009 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
The Star of Bethlehem: A Skeptical View by Aaron Adair.Michael R. Molnar - 2014 - Science, Religion and Culture 1 (3):174.
Human Rights and Foreign Direct Investment A Two-Stage Analysis.Shannon Lindsey Blanton & Robert G. Blanton - 2006 - Business and Society 45 (4):464-485.
The observation-ladenness of theory.Ioannis Votsis - unknown
Testing with the Toulmin Model.Jan Sobocan - unknown
Erratum to: Paying the cost of skeptical theism. [REVIEW]Jeff A. Snapper - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):233-234.
Non-commutative logic I: the multiplicative fragment.V. Michele Abrusci & Paul Ruet - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (1):29-64.
Skeptical Effectiveness: A Reply to Buford and Brueckner.Peter Murphy - 2016 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6 (4):397-403.
Skeptical theism and moral skepticism : a reply to Almeida and Oppy.Nick Trakakis & Yujin Nagasawa - 2004 - Ars Disputandi 4:1-1.
A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.Anthony G. Greenwald, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Laurie A. Rudman, Shelly D. Farnham, Brian A. Nosek & Deborah S. Mellott - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (1):3-25.
What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.Hans Halvorson - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
13 (#1,062,726)

6 months
5 (#707,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
The Problem of Meaning in Linguistics.W. V. O. Quine - 1953 - In Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.), From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 47-64.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos, Alan Musgrave, Roger C. Buck & Robert S. Cohen - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):266-274.
Science and pseudoscience: Introduction.M. Curd & J. A. Cover - 1998 - In Martin Curd & Jan Cover (eds.), Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues. Norton. pp. 1--2.

View all 8 references / Add more references