Freud, wollstonecraft, and ecofeminism

Environmental Ethics 16 (2):117-134 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I examine recent arguments to the effect that there are significant logical, conceptual, historical, or psychosexual connections between the subordination of women and the subordination of nature and argue that they are all problematic. Although there are important connections between women’s emancipation and the achievement of important environmental goals, they are practical connections rather than conceptual ones

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
97 (#178,275)

6 months
21 (#126,174)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karen Green
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

Environmental ethics.Andrew Brennan - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Liberal feminism.Amy Baehr - 2012 - In Peter Adamson (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. pp. 150-166.
The universal versus the particular in ecofeminist ethics.Grace Y. Kao - 2010 - Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (4):616-637.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references