Expert systems as extensions of the human mind: A user oriented, holistic approach to the design of multiple reasoning system environments and interfaces [Book Review]

AI and Society 6 (3):245-262 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Expert systems have had little impact as computing artifacts. In this paper we argue that the reason for this stems from the underlying assumption of most builders of expert systems that an expert system needs to acquire information and to control the interaction between the human user and itself. We show that this assumption has serious linguistic and usability flaws which diminish the likelihood of producing socially acceptable expert systems. We propose a reversal of this paradigm, for the design of expert systems, by assuming that it is the human user who needs to acquire information and to control the interaction between themselves and the system

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What kind of expert should a system be?Paul E. Johnson - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (1):77-97.
Legal implications in development and use of expert systems in agriculture.Willard Downs & Kelley Ann Newton - 1989 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (1):53-58.
Law, liability and expert systems.Dr Joseph A. Cannataci - 1989 - AI and Society 3 (3):169-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-20

Downloads
37 (#433,623)

6 months
10 (#276,350)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?