How Strong is Dr. Bloor's 'Strong Programme'?

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (1):67 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/0039-3681(79)90004-9

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Saving the Strong Programme? A critique of David Bloor’s recent work.Stephen Kemp - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):707-720.
Concepts, anomalies and reality: a response to Bloor and Fehér.Stephen Kemp - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):241-253.
The social construction of social constructionism.Peter Slezak - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):139 – 157.
Relativism and the Sociology of Mathematics: Remarks on Bloor, Flew, and Frege.Timm Triplett - 1986 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (1-4):439-450.
Saving the Strong Programme: a critique of Stephen Kemp’s recent paper.Márta Fehér - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):235-240.
Bloor's bluff: Behaviourism and the strong programme.Peter Slezak - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):241 – 256.
Contrastive Explanation and the 'Strong Programme' in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.Jeff Kochan - 2010 - Social Studies of Science 40 (1):127-44.
The "strong programme", normativity, and social causes.Chris Calvert-Minor - 2008 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38 (1):1–22.
Bad arguments against a good case (Laudan's attack on the strong programme).Márta Fehér - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):233-238.
Toward a monistic theory of science: The `strong programme' reconsidered.Stephen Kemp - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (3):311-338.
Alternative mathematics and the strong programme: Reply to Triplett.Richard C. Jennings - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):93 – 101.
The Edinburgh School After Forty Years: Its Philosophical Presuppositions And Its Methodology Of Science.Ewa Bińczyk - 2010 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 5 (1):27-47.
A Second Look at David Bloor’s Knowledge and Social Imagery.Peter Slezak - 1994 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (3):336-361.
Rethinking The “strong Programme” In The Sociology Of Knowledge.Adrian Haddock - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):19-40.
Naturalized epistemology, or what the Strong Programme can’t explain.Karyn L. Freedman - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (1):135-148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
48 (#337,469)

6 months
8 (#399,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references