The Use of Nonhuman Animals in Biomedical Research: Necessity and Justification

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):241-248 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discourse about the use of animals in biomedical research usually focuses on two issues: its empirical and moral use. The empirical issue asks whether the use of nonhumans in experiments is required in order to get data. The moral issue asks whether the use of nonhumans can be defended as matter of ethical theory. Although the use of animals in research may involve a plausible necessity claim, no moral justification exists for using nonhumans in situations in which we would not use humans

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Virtues of Hunting: A Reply to Jensen.Robert Lovering - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):68-76.
Two models of models in biomedical research.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):141-160.
Moral Transhumanism.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (6):656-669.
Util-izing animals.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
Contractualism and our duties to nonhuman animals.Matthew Talbert - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (2):201-215.
A compassionate autonomy alternative to speciesism.Constance K. Perry - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (3):237-246.
The ethics of extension: Philosophical speculation on nonhuman animals.David Lulka - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (2):157 – 180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
77 (#217,527)

6 months
6 (#531,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?