Military and Civil Reasons For Just Behavior in War

Philosophy in the Contemporary World 19 (2):39-49 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

US foreign policy became one of the most popular issues in public and academic discussions, particularly since George W. Bush was elected president. A lot has been said about the negative effects that the Bush administration had on the world's international relations and peace, mainly with regard to the restraints which are required by jus ad bellum. However, not much has been said about the damage that the Bush administration caused to the norms of jus in bello, by ignoring them or turning a blind eye toward their violations. In this paper, I want to recall a few military and civil reasons which have been neglected for following the requirements of jus in bello by the fighting soldiers and the fighting unit, as well as by the belligerent state.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant's ethics of war and peace.Brian Orend - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177.
Order and Affray: Defensive Privileges in Warfare.Toby Handfield & Patrick Emerton - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4):382 - 414.
War and intention.Darrell Cole - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):174-191.
Can There Be a Just War?Karsten J. Struhl - 2006 - Radical Philosophy Today 2006:3-25.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-12

Downloads
34 (#472,354)

6 months
9 (#315,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ezra Ovadia
Tel Aviv University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references