- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Standards for Family Decisions: Replacing Best Interests with Harm Prevention
American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):54-55 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Standards for animal research: Looking at the middle.Rebecca Dresser - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):123-143.
Divorce Solicitors and Ethical Approaches—The Best Interests of the Client and/or the Best Interests of the Family?Lisa Webley - 2004 - Legal Ethics 7 (2):231.
How bad can a good enough parent be?Liam Shields - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):163-182.
How Good Is “Good Enough”? The Case for Varying Standards of Evidence According to Need for New Interventions in HIV Prevention.Bridget Haire, John Kaldor & Christopher Fc Jordens - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (6):21-30.
Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
Article: Grandparent visitation law grows up: The trend toward awarding visitation only when the child would otherwise suffer harm.Joan Catherine Bohl - manuscript
Observations of physician, patient and family perceptions of informed consent in Houston, texas.Eugene V. Boisaubin - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):225 – 236.
Harm prevention and the benefits of marriage.Eric M. Cave - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):233–243.
Trust based obligations of the state and physician-researchers to patient-subjects.Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):542-547.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-11
Downloads
41 (#390,688)
6 months
10 (#276,689)
2010-09-11
Downloads
41 (#390,688)
6 months
10 (#276,689)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):9-19.
The best interest standard and children: clarifying a concept and responding to its critics.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (2):117-124.
Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.Giles Birchley - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):111-115.
Whose harm? Which metaphysic?Abram Brummett - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (1):43-61.
Substituted judgment in real life.Rebecca Dresser - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (9):731-738.
References found in this work
Between Prophylaxis and Child Abuse: The Ethics of Neonatal Male Circumcision.Michael Benatar & David Benatar - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):35-48.
The ethical canary: science, society, and the human spirit.Margaret A. Somerville - 2000 - New York: Viking Press.
Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health.F. M. Hodges - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (1):10-16.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-ldh8k uwo