Harm prevention and the benefits of marriage

Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):233–243 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are entitlements, opportunities, and rights presently reserved to married couples by the basic structure of society, its major social institutions. Some claim that this is as it should be. But given the abiding effects of the basic structure on the prospects of individuals living within it, restrictions on liberty built into the basic structure require justification. One might think that we could justify reserving the benefits of marriage to married couples by appealing to harm prevention. In this paper, I argue that the prospects of doing so successfully are dim.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Same-sex marriage and the regulation of language.Andrew Stivers & Andrew Valls - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):237-253.
Brief Refutations of Some Common Arguments against Same-Sex Marriage.Benjamin A. Gorman - 2004 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Issues 4 (1):13-15.
Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health.Angus Dawson & Marcel Verweij (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Double prevention and powers.Stephen Mumford & Rani Anjum - 2009 - Journal of Critical Realism 8 (3):277-293.
The ethics of empowerment.Jeffrey Gandz & Frederick G. Bird - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (4):383 - 392.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#280,947)

6 months
7 (#430,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Cave
Arkansas State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references