- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Putnam, Quine - and the Facts
Philosophical Topics 20 (1):293-315 (1992)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Quine, Putnam, and the ‘Quine–Putnam’ Indispensability Argument.David Liggins - 2008 - Erkenntnis 68 (1):113 - 127.
Comments on Axel Mueller's “putnam vs. Quine on revisability and the analytic–synthetic distinction”.Hilary Putnam - 2012 - In Maria Baghramian (ed.), Reading Putnam. New York: Routledge. pp. 179.
Van Inwagen and the Quine-Putnam indispensability argument.Mitchell O. Stokes - 2007 - Erkenntnis 67 (3):439 - 453.
Quine on Quine.Burton Dreben - 2006 - In Roger F. Gibson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Quine. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 287--93.
Indispensability arguments and instrumental nominalism.Richard Pettigrew - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):687-709.
On How to Avoid the Indeterminacy of Translation.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):395-413.
Quine and pragmatism.Heikki J. Koskinen & Sami Pihlström - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):309-346.
Putnam versus Quine on the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction.Axel Mueller - 2012 - In Maria Baghramian (ed.), Reading Putnam. New York: Routledge. pp. 145-178.
Εικάζει η φιλοσοφία για εμπειρικά δεδομένα; Η γνωσιακή διαπερατότητα της αντίληψης [Does philosophy speculate about empirical facts? The cognitive penetrability of perception].Vincent C. Müller - 2010 - Noesis 6 (1):161-164.
Putnam’s account of apriority and scientific change: its historical and contemporary interest.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2010 - Synthese 176 (3):429-445.
The Dreben Panel.W. V. Quine, Burton Dreben, Martin Davies, George Boolos & Rudolf Fara - 1994 - Philosophy International.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
100 (#177,564)
6 months
5 (#707,850)
2009-01-28
Downloads
100 (#177,564)
6 months
5 (#707,850)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine's Naturalism.Sander Verhaegh - 2018 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The rise and fall of computational functionalism.Oron Shagrir - 2005 - In Yemima Ben-Menahem (ed.), Hilary Putnam (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus). Cambridge University Press.
“Plausible insofar as it is intelligible”: Quine on underdetermination.Rogério Passos Severo - 2008 - Synthese 161 (1):141-165.
3 Wittgenstein and the Inexpressible.Juliet Floyd - 2007 - In Alice Crary (ed.), Wittgenstein and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Cora Diamond. MIT Press. pp. 177-234.
Putnam, Context, and Ontology.Steven Gross - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (4):507 - 553.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8fb5884b9-k4bxp uwo