Comments on Axel Mueller's “putnam vs. Quine on revisability and the analytic–synthetic distinction”

In Maria Baghramian (ed.), Reading Putnam. New York: Routledge. pp. 179 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quine on the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction.Stefanie Rocknak - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
De Semantiek Van "Two Dogmas of Empiricism".H. J. Kaptein - forthcoming - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte.
Two dogmatists.Charles Pigden - 1987 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 30 (1 & 2):173 – 193.
On an Analytic-Synthetic Distinction.Bruce Aune - 1972 - American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (3):235 - 242.
Quine, analyticity and philosophy of mathematics.John P. Burgess - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):38–55.
Quine on Analyticity.E. E. Sleinis - 1973 - Philosophy 48 (183):79 - 84.
From within and from without. Two perspectives on analytic sentences.Olaf L. Müller - 2002 - In Wolfram Hinzen & Hans Rott (eds.), Belief and meaning: Essays at the interface. Deutsche Bibliothek der Wissenschaften.
Quine – Peter Hylton. [REVIEW]Rogério Passos Severo - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):738-740.
The analytic/synthetic distinction.Gillian Russell - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (5):712–729.
Analytic–Synthetic.Jonathan Bennett - 1959 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59:163 - 188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
34 (#480,817)

6 months
1 (#1,501,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references